Page 2 of 4

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:59 pm
by dave_rickart
Dr. Strangelove wrote:One week after losing to the Hoosiers, Mizzou stuns South Carolina at home
and the Hoosiers follow by getting curbstomped at home by Merryland.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:30 am
by KeviNole
Pshaw - SEC teams don't care about playing non-SEC teams. Indiana is merely a diversion between WAR!

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 2:29 pm
by AlabamAlum
Image

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:37 am
by Jungle Rat
Stop posting personal pics

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:44 pm
by savgator
Nice game. Go tigers. Beat Arkansaw.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:27 pm
by DDAL
Fuck off Sav.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:37 pm
by savgator
Lol. I knew you would post.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:45 pm
by DDAL
Ha!

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 7:19 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
Congrats to Indiana! Champs of the SEC East!

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 7:21 pm
by AlabamAlum
So, who you like in the B1G Championship? LSU or VaTech?

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 7:26 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
Far, Far, far less embarrassing than having your potential champ lose at home to Indiana who hasn't even won a single Big10 game

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 10:51 pm
by AlabamAlum
Than having your potential champ lose to a horrible VaTech team?

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 10:54 pm
by AlabamAlum
The fact of the matter is that if Mizzou played Indiana again they'd win. Just as if Ohio State played VaTech again, they'd win. Idiots bring this shit up like it means something.


No offense.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 11:02 pm
by 10ac
Defense either.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 11:21 pm
by AlabamAlum
Heh

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:36 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
SEC apologists (and they are legion) point to the rigors of an SEC schedule. We have often heard it termed a 'war'. The argument of said individuals typically goes that an SEC schedule is so brutally difficult that you cannot take a single week off. No other conference has to deal with this. Every other conference is extremely easy to breeze through compared with the SEC. Yet here we have the SEC East champ who lost to the 13th or 14th best team in the Big10. This would seem to indicate that if you take the top teams from the SEC and put them in the Big10 or the Pac12 or the Big12 that their road would not be as pathetically easy as claimed. Perhaps, just maybe, SEC teams would face the possibility of losing one or two games even in these far inferior leagues. Fluke game? Sure it was. But the game proves that top teams in the SEC could easily pick up random losses even in a league you consider far beneath your godlike abilities.

Wasted words to a Mike Price denier and a saboteur of UAB football aspirations.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:29 pm
by aTm
Missouri is the best of an awful east division. They even got to play only the worst two west teams as well and squeezed out victories there.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:33 pm
by aTm
I imagine that by the end of the day the ACC will also be crowing about games with their top teams against the dregs of the east.

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:42 pm
by KeviNole
You rang?

Re: Missouri Tigers

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:44 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
aTm wrote:I imagine that by the end of the day the ACC will also be crowing about games with their top teams against the dregs of the east.
So basically all seven teams in the East suck ass? And there are two weak teams in the West as well? Yet the SEC is absolutely dominant and far, far better than any other conference? So far above everyone else that a 2-loss SEC team should make the playoffs ahead of 1-loss teams from any other conference, no doubt.